Your body vs. Implants - Kaitlyn Sadtler
2,188,015 Views
4,833 Questions Answered
Let’s Begin…
Insulin pumps improve the lives of millions of people with diabetes around the world by monitoring blood sugar, delivering insulin, and preventing the need for constant finger-pricking. But there’s a catch: they’re temporary. And it’s not only insulin pumps that have this problem, but all bodily implants. Why is that? Kaitlyn Sadtler details how our immune system reacts to foreign bodies.
Additional Resources for you to Explore
As mentioned previously, our body’s immune system defends us against all sorts of dangers, and these include what we call “foreign bodies.” If you’ve ever gotten a splinter or had your ears pierced, you have had your immune system respond against a foreign body – in those cases the splinter or the earring is the foreign body. This response is why you begin to have issues with medical device implants, like the glucose monitors and insulin pumps mentioned in the video. Once our immune system detects this threat, it begins the process of trying to break it down. Special immune cells called macrophages come in and begin to try to break down the implant, and in the case of the glucose monitors, even these early actions of the immune system are enough to begin to throw off readings. After macrophages cannot degrade the implant, then our body tries to wall it off my depositing dense scar tissue around the implant. This tissue is made of collagen – the scar that forms around an implant is very similar to the scar that forms when you get a cut on your skin, both are trying to protect you from the outside world and any invading bacteria!
Check out another TED-Ed lesson on how the immune system works by clicking here.
Here is an example video of the foreign body response to implantation of a hernia mesh.
Academic Readings:
Anderson, James M., Analiz Rodriguez, and David T. Chang. "Foreign body reaction to biomaterials." Seminars in immunology. Vol. 20. No. 2. Academic Press, 2008.
Coleman, D. L., R. N. King, and J. D. Andrade. "The foreign body reaction: a chronic inflammatory response." Journal of biomedical materials research 8.5 (1974): 199-211.
Ziats, Nicholas P., Kathleen M. Miller, and James M. Anderson. "In vitro and in vivo interactions of cells with biomaterials." Biomaterials 9.1 (1988): 5-13.
Anderson, James M., et al. "Host reactions to biomaterials and their evaluation." Biomaterials science. Academic press, 1996. 165-214.
Badylak, Stephen F., et al. "Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling." Tissue Engineering Part A 14.11 (2008): 1835-1842.
Academic Papers by author of video:
Sadtler, Kaitlyn, et al. "Design, clinical translation and immunological response of biomaterials in regenerative medicine." Nature Reviews Materials 1.7 (2016): 16040.
Sadtler, Kaitlyn, et al. "Divergent immune responses to synthetic and biological scaffolds." Biomaterials 192 (2019): 405-415.
About TED-Ed Animations
TED-Ed Animations feature the words and ideas of educators brought to life by professional animators. Are you an educator or animator interested in creating a TED-Ed Animation? Nominate yourself here »
Meet The Creators
- Educator Kaitlyn Sadtler
- Director Andrew Foerster
- Animator Andrew Foerster
- Designer Andrew Foerster
- Editor Andrew Foerster
- Art Director Andrew Foerster
- Storyboard Artist Andrew Foerster
- Character Designer Andrew Foerster
- Layout Artist Andrew Foerster
- Sound Designer Devin Polaski
- Composer Devin Polaski
- Director of Production Gerta Xhelo
- Editorial Producer Alex Rosenthal
- Associate Producer Bethany Cutmore-Scott
- Script Editor Emma Bryce
- Fact-Checker Francisco Diez