How can you change someone's mind? (hint: facts aren't always enough) - Hugo Mercier
- 2,086,934 Views
- 31,787 Questions Answered
- TEDEd Animation
Let’s Begin…
Why do arguments change people’s minds in some cases and backfire in others? Hugo Mercier explains how arguments are more convincing when they rest on a good knowledge of the audience, taking into account what the audience believes, who they trust, and what they value.
Create and share a new lesson based on this one.
Meet The Creators
- Educator Hugo Mercier
- Director Biljana Labovic
- Narrator Addison Anderson
- Animator Charlotte Arene
- Designer Charlotte Arene
- Sound Designer Weston Fonger
- Content Producer Gerta Xhelo
- Editorial Producer Alex Rosenthal
- Associate Producer Bethany Cutmore-Scott, Elizabeth Cox
- Script Editor Alex Gendler
- Fact-Checker Francisco Diez
Additional Resources for you to Explore
For centuries, philosophers have debated how arguments work and why some are more effective than others. This TED-Ed lesson introduces Aristotle’s view on the topic. In the twentieth century, the two most influential argumentation scholars have been Chaïm Perelman and Stephen Toulmin, who created the influential Toulmin model of argumentation—which you can find explained in this video.
In parallel to these philosophical works, the twentieth century saw psychologists tackle empirically the question of which arguments work, when, and for whom. One of the most popular theories suggests that our response to arguments is deeply influenced by our motivation, so that we’re mostly able to discriminate between strong and weak arguments when the conclusion matters to us. More recently, Dan Sperber and the educator have integrated work on reasoning, social psychology, and argumentation to develop the argumentative theory of reasoning, according to which the main functions of human reason are social: to exchange justifications and arguments with others. Click here to learn more.
In parallel to these philosophical works, the twentieth century saw psychologists tackle empirically the question of which arguments work, when, and for whom. One of the most popular theories suggests that our response to arguments is deeply influenced by our motivation, so that we’re mostly able to discriminate between strong and weak arguments when the conclusion matters to us. More recently, Dan Sperber and the educator have integrated work on reasoning, social psychology, and argumentation to develop the argumentative theory of reasoning, according to which the main functions of human reason are social: to exchange justifications and arguments with others. Click here to learn more.
TED-Ed
Lesson Creator
New York, NY
Create and share a new lesson based on this one.
Meet The Creators
- Educator Hugo Mercier
- Director Biljana Labovic
- Narrator Addison Anderson
- Animator Charlotte Arene
- Designer Charlotte Arene
- Sound Designer Weston Fonger
- Content Producer Gerta Xhelo
- Editorial Producer Alex Rosenthal
- Associate Producer Bethany Cutmore-Scott, Elizabeth Cox
- Script Editor Alex Gendler
- Fact-Checker Francisco Diez
More from Playing with Language
305,253 views
688,382 views
374,399 views
2,042,058 views