One of history's most dangerous myths - Anneliese Mehnert
474,686 Views
2,439 Questions Answered
Let’s Begin…
From the 1650s through the late 1800’s, European colonists descended on South Africa. They sought to claim the region, becoming even more aggressive after discovering the area’s abundant natural resources. To support their claims to the land, the colonizers asserted they were settling in empty land devoid of local people. Was this argument true? Anneliese Mehnert debunks the Empty Land Theory.
Create and share a new lesson based on this one.
About TED-Ed Animations
TED-Ed Animations feature the words and ideas of educators brought to life by professional animators. Are you an educator or animator interested in creating a TED-Ed Animation? Nominate yourself here »
Meet The Creators
- Educator Anza Mehnert
- Director Héloïse Dorsan Rachet
- Narrator Christina Greer
- Composer Salil Bhayani, cAMP Studio
- Sound Designer Amanda P.H. Bennett, cAMP Studio
- Director of Production Gerta Xhelo
- Produced by Abdallah Ewis, Anna Bechtol
- Editorial Director Alex Rosenthal
- Editorial Producer Dan Kwartler
- Script Editor Soraya Field Fiorio
- Fact-Checker Charles Wallace
Cheney Munson
Lesson in progress
Many colonists had justified their taking and subsequent ownership of land by the fact that they brought development, government and technology to the people being colonized. Is this a justifiable reason for colonialism?
Comments are closed on this discussion.
tom rossignol
Lesson completed
in response to Qönçə Quliyeva Show comment
cest faux chef
Qönçə Quliyeva
Lesson in progress
I think there are some examples in history that after colonization, the territory which colonized became more developed country with technology. But in this situation i don't think we can justify their unfair actions to africans like restricting voting rights, education and decimated people