Male condoms are ubiquitous and due to the 98% theoretical effectiveness, there hasn't been a great need for finding a replacement.
The major difference is that female contraceptive methods cover a range of lifestyles, and options for men for each of these cases should be provided.
Male contraception has to be evaluated with regards to factors such as disease transmission, frequency of intercourse, trust in partner's contraceptives, and more.

Since condoms have such a high rate for prevention which is almost 98%, there has not necessarily been a need to search for other methods. However with women not only do they need to be able to cover all the different lifestyles women have, but due to all the side affects, women are more inclined to search out other methods of contraceptives in an attempt to prevent permanent affects that men don't have to concern themselves with

There hasn’t been any contraceptive drugs for men is because it's different when it comes to suppressing an egg versus sperm. For example, “… blocking the production of millions of sperm per day in men versus preventing the release of one egg per month in women is just more complicated, biologically speaking (Mullin, 2020).” Again, since there are more complications with trying to suppress sperm production that is why the two effective methods for men are a ****** and vasectomy. Also, as mentioned before there is little to no funding available for clinical trials to be done on different contraceptive methods for men. To conclude this discussion these are some of the reasons why there hasn’t been as much success in discovering other reliable contraceptive methods for men.

I agree with you regarding the need or great demand for finding a replacement to male condoms. Some other theories I have as to why this hasn't been done is due to the fact that it seems to be viewed a little bit more as a woman's obligation to prevent pregnancy. Also, I would be interested in the data that shows the percentage of men who are willing to use this very effective method.

It's very easy to see why there hasn't been much success in advancements towards male contraceptives for numerous reasons. The ****** in particular (while it could DEFINITELY be improved) is a very successful contraceptive despite anecdotal evidence to the contrary. 82% effective in real life terms is still very effective. Another reason is perhaps lack of motivation to improve on male contraceptives from a marketing standpoint as well as just how advanced female contraceptives are already. These are not excuses but mere observations. It's also somewhat "easier" to block out 1 egg vs millions of sperm as detailed by Mullin.