“In a Grove” is just one of the over 150 works by “the father of the Japanese short story”, as Ryūnosuke Akutagawa is commonly referred to. He was known for combining eastern and western styles in his work, counting the American poet Edgar Allan Poe as a large influence and employing Japanese techniques such as
ma, the concept of negative space, and
shishoshetsu, or confessional-style prose, in his writing. Though he created an extensive body of work, he lived a short life, dying by suicide in 1927 at the age of 35. He is considered a “national writer” of Japan, with his stories incorporated into the country’s school curriculum.
Akira Kurosawa is regarded as the first Japanese director to gain international acclaim. In addition to
Rashomon, his filmography includes the emotional
Ikiru and the quintessential action movie
Seven Samurai. Though Akutagawa formulated the plot that originally describes the Rashomon effect, it was the popularity of Kurosawa’s film that led to the creation of the term.
The Rashomon effect has real implications across a variety of disciplines, from philosophy and communications to sociology and anthropology. It often pops up in politics and social justice, too, like in disagreements about politically and racially charged issues such as policing and gun control. In these scenarios, the effect highlights how our internal biases can subconsciously or consciously influence our interpretation of what has happened.
This lesson further explains how factors like our political identity can affect our ability to process information.
I think that a singular, objective truth do not exist. Because it depends on the time, place and people involved and our decision when we are working with different information, backgrounds and biases.
The singular objective truth is what actually transpired, without any opinions or biases. Simply the facts of the matter. However, we have no way to accurately and reliably determine what the truth is because all things are recorded or processed by humans in some way. The act of being human already eqiups us with opinions and biases that make the straight reporting and inte4pretation of events impossible. In this way, the truth becomes out of our reach.
I agree that there is no so-called singular, objective truth. Because when something happens, people tend to conclude it based on their perspectives, experience, and background knowledge. It could be right to you but wrong to others. Instead, there are multiple possible truths, and in the full picture, it comes down to objective great truth.
The court can be taken as an example, the Jude has to make decisions based on the accounts of two stories.The law is not rigid if it relies on the account of single witness.